Georgia wins praise for it’s response to virus

Amiran Gamkrelidze is a Junior Health Minister in Georgia. Now, as the Minister in charge of dealing with Coronavirus, he’s become a national hero.

Georgia has been acclaimed for its response to the virus, with the EU’s Ambassador to the country stating that  “I cannot think of a better place to be right now than here in Georgia.”

Although the Georgian economy had been expanding, it is still relatively poor by European standards.

The key to Georgia’s success was in acting quickly when the virus was in its early stages before it posed a threat in the country. Travel limitations started on 28th January, with all arrivals temperature checked at entry points and anyone arriving from a country in which coronavirus was present, or with symptoms put into quarantine (which is different to voluntary self isolation).

Bars, restaurants, schools, universities, sports and cultural events were closed early on, and gatherings, including funerals, were banned.The entire public transport system underwent overnight deep cleaning every night.This before Britain had even suggested social distancing.

As the situation progressed, everyone  arriving from abroad was put into quarantine. One Georgian citizen arriving back into the country posted about her surprise and delight at being accommodated in a luxury hotel in Batumi with sea views. Buses were waiting at Tbilisi airport to transport passengers (with appropriate social distancing) 225 miles to the luxury resort.

Extensive street cleansing is being carried out, a 9pm to 6am curfew is in place and extensive contact tracing is taking place.

A StopCov fund has been set up 124m GEL ($39m). Bidzana Ivanishvili, founder of the ruling Georgian Dream party donated 100m of that figure. Government Ministers have agreed to donate one third of their salaries to the fund.

A four month holiday on property and income taxes for the hospitality sector has been introduced, alongside other measures to protect the economy.

Politics in Georgia is confrontational. Although the ruling Georgian Dream party and opposition United National Movement (UNM) are both of the centre right there is fierce personal animosities between them.

Amiran Gamkrelidze

Gamkrelidze, a quiet and mild man, came under attack from the UNM, but simply responded that the issue of COVID19 is outside party politics. “There is no time for politics now” he said.

Georgians were shocked when it emerged that a 62 year old Azeri woman who had returned  from Azerbaijan and attended a wedding with 100 guests tested positive for COVID19. The woman, with underlying health issues was hospitalised, and moved to intensive care. The nation was relieved when she recovered from the disease.

So far there have been just three deaths from coronavirus in Georgia. 296 cases have been recorded, of whom 69 have recovered.

Malawi update: Fresh poll likely despite Coronavirus fears

Fresh elections could go ahead in Malawi on July 2nd despite concerns over the effects of Coronavirus on the country.

The results of last year’s election were declared null and void by the Constitutional Court because of voting irregularities. Defending President Peter Mutharika was re-elected with one third of the vote in a close contest.

The Constitutional Court in their 500 page ruling ordered the Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) to hold a fresh vote within 150 days. Although MEC argued that the vote should be delayed further because of Coronavirus, it is clear that they have no power to overturn the Court’s ruling.

Mutharika and his Cabinet announced that they would take a 10% pay cut to help pay for the nation’s fight against the virus. Estranged Vice President Saulos Chilima, who was among the defeated Presidential candidates, responded by saying that he would forego 100% of his salary.

Meanwhile the opposition parties are trying to agree on a single candidate to stand against Mutharika in a 50+1 poll system as interpreted and instructed by the Constitutional courts. Mutharika’s future is likely to depend on whether opposition leaders can put their countries interest ahead of their personal ambitions to agree on grand alliance and chose one  candidate. At the time of writing nothing has been disclosed.

According to George Wiseman Gondwe, Malawi’s social commentator, choosing someone to lead this alliance is a mountain for the two political blocks due to several factors. Gondwe said that Lazarus Chakwela’s Malawi Congress Party (MCP) which is the oldest political party in Malawi, believes that their leader should take the lead because they are the largest opposition party. Chakwela finished runner up in the official results of the Presidential Election. Saulos Chilima, Mitharika’s Vice President finished third and leads the United Transformation Movement (UTM). He claims to have a broader appeal geographically and across ethnic groups as well as experience of Government and commerce.

Chilima (left) and Chakwela (right) signing an electoral alliance.

Mutharika’s Democratic Progress Party (DPP) recently signed an electoral alliance with the opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) whose founder is Malawi’s former President Dr. Bakili Muluzi and now headed by his son Atupele Muluzi who lost his Parliamentary  seat in Machinga North East, in the southern part of Malawi.

Atupele Muluza (left) and Peter Mutharika (right) during Alliance signing ceremony at State House

Schools are closed and large gatherings banned to combat Coronavirus. A package has been announced to support small and medium size businesses, with petrol prices also frozen. In his recent press briefing,Malawi’s estranged Vice President Chilima criticised the Government’s measures arguing for further cuts to petrol prices, channeling more resources to the fight, and changing several idle stage Lodges to COVID-19 isolation centres.

A ban on church services was announced by the Government, but later reversed.

Chilima donates his full salary to the fight against COVID-19 while Mutharika and his cabinet have donated 10% of their salaries. Chilima said that the President and his cabinet should cut their salaries to 50%.

While the country is on partial lockdown, Mutharika has ordered the tobacco markets to stay open to protect Malawi’s chief foreign currency earner.

Many office workers are working in shifts to enable more effective social distancing.

But in this country, among the poorest in the World, the message is not getting through to the rural areas. The health system is not sufficiently robust to contain the outbreak with inadequate facilities and workers. 

Health services, already overstretched, may struggle to cope if the epidemic penetrates to levels that many fear to be likely.

Risk allowances to health care workers have been increased , and many have complained of a lack of personal protective equipment, as well as demanding improved pay and conditions to compensate them for the risks that they are exposed to.

On 7th April Malawi recorded its first death from the virus, a 51 year old woman who had just returned from the UK.

Payments Abroad: A Cautionary Tale

I thought that I knew it all, but I was recently caught out by what I thought would be a routine transaction to Ethiopia.

I’m assisting a British company hoping to win a contract with the Ethiopian Government. As part of this I commissioned a journalist to write a report – someone who I’ve known and dealt with for many years; a dear friend in fact, but a journalist of international renown.

The report told my customer in detail about how his industry operates in Ethiopia, what will be needed to win the business, who the decision makers are, and a little about their backgrounds, and confirming that the business can be transacted in an honest and open manner.

 The journalist requested payment by bank transfer, which I arranged through a visit to the branch, in which I explained the project and the purpose of the payment.

My first knowledge of a problem was when my bank card was refused in a supermarket. A visit to the bank confirmed that my account had been frozen, with no reason given.

The reason, in fact, was a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filed by my bank to the National Crime Agency.

The latest figures available show that almost 40,000 examples are happening every month, with the number probably having risen above that number by now. In many cases this is happening to people and businesses that regularly send payments abroad. It may be that a bank official became suspicious, or that an algorithm in the banks computer system threw up a red flag.

Under the Proceeds of Crime Act, bank officials are required to report suspicious payments to the National Crime Agency. Any official failing to do so is committing a crime, so they tend to err on the side of reporting.

Suspicion is difficult to define, but the NCA, when considering money laundering, states that “there does not need to be anything amounting to evidence of the suspected money laundering. The threshold for suspicion under POCA is generally considered to be low.”

Filing the SAR is, in itself, also a defence against any potential allegation of assisting money laundering.

Bank staff will not reveal to the customer what is happening because if they did they would be guilty of the crime of tipping off a suspect that they are under investigation. So they say that they don’t know why their customers account is frozen.

The NCA are aware of the difficulties that an SAR can cause customers, including the fact that this has led to in some instances to employees not being paid. Their website says that they are “aware that some customers have self-harmed in front of banking clerks who have told them they cannot have their money.”

The likelihood of this happening could increase, given the NCA warning that “it is a realistic possibility that the UK’s exit from the EU will impact the prevalence of bribery and corruption over the next five years, as UK companies potentially come into greater contact with corrupt markets.”

I have signed up to my local authorities cheap eco-energy scheme which requires a top up from time to time, and after returning home from the bank my electricity was cut off. In all my bank account was frozen for 9 days. Had the NCA decided to investigate it would have been frozen for a further month at least.

SAR’s can be raised by a variety of bodies such as solicitors, accountants, estate agents and the gaming and leisure industry. In practice over 80% are raised by banks. That’s significantly more than the money transfer agencies that I have used frequently.

I chose to regard this project as a self employed transaction and put it through my main bank account. I’m not convinced that using an account with a different bank, or through a company would have reduced the chances of a SAR being raised, in fact it might have increased it, but it would have avoided the problems caused to me.

There have been cases when the Governments in the country that payment was being made to have been alerted and seized assets of British citizens or companies in their country. Have I been complacent in believing that this wouldn’t happen to me, or to my customers because of my contacts there and because Government officials and / or Ministers are generally aware of our projects?

I think that I need to look again at that and take measures to ensure that it couldn’t!

Tanzanian election of 2015

With election results declared the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi Party (CCM) has held off a challenge from an opposition coalition on the Tanzanian mainland, and John Magufuli declared to be the new President.

But the semi autonomous Zanzibar has been plunged into crisis after the Chair of the Zanzibar Election Commission halted the counting process and declared the election void. The 2010 election was settled by just 1% of the vote, with accusations of malpractice against the ruling CCM. To preserve the peace CCM and rivals the Civic United Front (CUF) had concluded a power sharing agreement with Government posts allocated according to share of the vote.

Traditionally CUF, members of Liberal International, have been supporters of greater autonomy, and independence for Zanzibar. The possibility of oil in Zanzibar waters prompted discussions with the Tanzanian Government about how oil revenues would be distributed, CUF arguing that Zanzibar has not benefited from Tanzanian oil finds outside Zanzibars waters and that Zanzibar should receive the revenues from Zanzibari oil.

That was certainly one reason for increased support for CUF and during my visit to Zanzibar in September. I met a number of former CCM officials who had defected.

Seif Sharif Hamad, the CUF Presidental candidate for Zanzibar was expelled from the ruling party in the days before multi party democracy and was imprisoned without trial for two and a half years. He has been the CUF candidate in elections since a multi party system was introduced, but aged 72, this is widely regarded as his last chance. He was Vice President during the last five years under the power sharing agreement.

International observers were satisfied with the election and it is clear that the annulment occurred as it emerged that CUF would win. The decision seems to have been made by ZEC Chair Jecha Salem Jecha without consulting other ZEC members – there were reports of fist fights between members of the commission when Jecha’s intentions became clear. The reason given was voting irregularities, although Zanzibari votes in the Tanzanian election were accepted and included in the overall results. It is not clear whether the ZEC has the legal right to annul an election.

Protests have been made by the EU, USA, UK, International Observers and the East African Community. ZEC has been asked to clarify the details of alleged irregularities. Both the Zanzibar Law Society and Tanganyika Law Society have said that the annulment was illegal. CUF has appealed for calm, in a part of the World in which violence has been a frequent accompaniment to elections.

If, as seems certain, this is an attempt by the CCM to remain in power by manipulating the results, it is likely to backfire in the long run. Already there are growing calls for independence from Tanzania.

Although politics in Zanzibar are not overtly tribal, there is an historical context which CUF has among its ranks many of the old trading families from the Sultanate, with historic links to slavery and oppression of the ‘African’ community and CCM the successor of the revolution that overthrew it, committed acts of vengeance and, in the minds of some of its older leaders, will not surrender power back and see the union of Tanzania as a guarantor of their security. Their fears may be more imaginary than real, and felt less by a younger generation, but national reconciliation is needed.

It is widely believed that CUF, while losing narrowly to CCM in every previous election, actually should have won them all.

The whole of Tanzania voted on the same day. CCM which has ruled Tanzania continuously was thought to be facing a serious challenge in the National election, as four major opposition parties united against them. The Party was also rocked by corruption scandals and internal conflicts. Edward Lowassa, who had hoped to be the CCM Presidential candidate, defected to the opposition after being edged out of the selection process.

Lowassa, a former Prime Minister, had given retiring President Kinwete support over the years, but was tainted by allegations of corruption and displayed inappropriate wealth. Kinwete, aware of the dangers of being seen to be supported by Lowassas business contacts decided instead to support his friend and distant relative Bernard Membe as candidate.

Under CCM rules the 38 prospective candidates should be vetted by the Ethics and Security Committee of CCM. The committee only approved 5 names including Membe, and excluding Lowassa. Lowassas supporters campaigned to stop Membe, with John Magafuli being elected as candidate, seemingly by accident.

Lowassa immediately defected to the opposition and was adopted as their Presidential candidate. Lowassa is a likeable person and probably the most popular politician in Tanzania. He brought some supporters with him from the CCM, although some opposition members left the coalition in disgust.

The united opposition was formed of four parties. Their programmes differed – Chedema, the largest, is a conservative party, while the second largest the Civic United Front (CUF) is a member of Liberal International. What brought them together was a shared interest in ending the CCM’s monopoly over power and ending the corruption that has dogged CCM.

The irony is that while the charismatic Lowassa is tainted by corruption allegations, Magufuli has a reputation as a diligent hard working and honest political lightweight with a track record of delivering the goods. At campaign rallies, both candidates have made some ambitious promises, but Magafuli has been able to point to a record of delivering results.

There is a feeling that the CCM is in gradual decline. Its vote has dropped in successive elections. As the Taganyika African National Union (TANU) it led Tanzania to independence and it commands the respect of older voters as well as having power bases in rural areas and among women. But Tanzania is a young country and its youth don’t revere CCM because of its historic role.

Regardless of whether Magufuli will be able to bring about the changes that Tanzania needs, CCM will need to broaden its appeal to young people. Seven, mostly ageing, Ministers lost their seats in the election, so in Tanzania as well as the semi autonomous Zanzibar, the political future will have a different feel about it.

Georgian Dream

With elections due next year Georgia’s ruling Georgian Dream coalition seems to be losing support with economic and political pressures growing.

The coalition was formed to oppose the excesses of the previous Government of former President Mikhail Saakashvili and his centre right United National Movement (UNM). Formed by billionairre businessman Bidzina Ivanishvili Georgian Dream originally brought six political groups together in a populist coalition.

Saakashvili was well thought of in the West credited with reducing corruption and as a staunch ally, with a strong anti Russian stance. He became unpopular in Georgia as a dictatorial and uncompromising figure. It has been suggested that corruption moved away from abuse within the public sector towards the private sector. One UNM member described him to me as eccentric.

Many of Saakashvilis aims were supported by Georgians, especially turning the country into a modern part of Europe. He was uncompromising in refusing to accept the Russian occupation of 18% of Georgia; but that didn’t mean that Georgians supported the disastrous war of 2008 which Georgia had no chance of winning.

Under Saakashvili modern Government buildings and street art were constructed, transforming Tbilisi. But the excesses provoked criticism by many who felt that much of the historic parts of the city were destroyed or at risk. In some cases businesses and homes had to make way for these developments.

One Georgian Dream Minister told me that there are limits to the number of people that a Government can alienate without paying a price. And unemployment remained high.

Saakashvili was also criticised for the use of tear gas and rubber bullets against political protesters and the Government accused of allowing the mistreatment of prisoners.

So when the reclusive Bidzina Ivanishvili established Georgian Dream there was considerable support. People believed that Ivanishvili, Georgias most successful businessman, had the qualities needed to build a better future for the country and that his own immense wealth meant that he would be beyond corruption. He was a huge benefactor of the arts, sports and his home region of Sachkhere.

In fact the coalition was populist in nature, embracing a wide range of political views, led and bankrolled by Ivanishvili. It swept to power in the 2012 Parliamentary Election, gained the Presidency in 2013 and won local and Mayoral elections in 2014.

Ivanishvili became Prime Minister but resigned after 13 months in favour of his long standing friend Irakli Garibashvili. However he continues to claim credit for the defeat of the UNM, fund Georgian Dream and express his views publically.

The six parties of Georgian Dream were:- The Conservative Party of Georgia; the pro-business Industry Will Save Georgia; National Forum, one of a few parties in Georgia opposed to NATO membership; the Republican Party of Georgia, a member of Liberal International; the Free Democrats which also espouses Liberal principles and the Green Party.

The parties had little in common apart from their opposition to the UNM, and the Free Democrats left the coalition in January 2015. One Republican Party MP expressed concerns to me about ‘far right’ members. The one thing that holds the coalition together is an intense dislike of Saakashvili and the UNM.

The battle of words between Georgian Dream and the UNM sometimes verges on the ridiculous with each blaming the other for all of Georgia’s problems. When the Georgian currency fell in value a Government spokesman blamed it on the strength of the dollar and adverse publicity from the UNM. When Georgia’s fancied contestant in the Eurovision Song Contest finished a disappointing 11th Saakashvili blamed the Government for a falling Georgian popularity in Europe!

A number of UNM politicians have been arrested, actions that the UNM claim are politically motivated. Former Prime Minister Vano Merabishvili was imprisoned for five years for abuse of office, bribing voters and inefficient use of Government funds. Former Mayor of Tbilisi Gigi Ugulava is currently under arrest for misuse of public funds.

Saakashvili himself has left Georgia where he too is charged with a number of offences. He is currently Governor of Odessa and has taken out Ukrainian citizenship and renounced Georgian citizenship so that he cannot be extradited under the Ukrainian constitution. Sadly he has called for vengeance if the UNM triumph over Georgian Dream in next years elections.

The economy is in a state of collapse. Yet politicians have been hitting the headlines for different reasons. Ivanishvili turned on Georgian President Margvelashvili who had decided to reside in the Presidential Palace. The Palace was built by Saakashvili overlooking the Mtkvari river, and Ivanishvilis residence on the other side of the valley. Ivanishvili took its building personally and had wanted his party’s President to live elsewhere.

After the flood that hit Tbilisi on June 14th 2015 the World watched TV coverage of animals that escaped from the zoo. The handling of events by the Government has been widely criticised. There were no warnings given, despite the fact that the flood waters had built up over a three hour period; a tiger killed someone a day after the Government claimed that all animals had been caught; rescue helicopters had been allowed to fall into disrepair and most of the clean up work was carried out by volunteers with Government vehicles unable to get to the scene.

The Government criticised the Zoo Keeper for the escape of the animals which backfired as residents demonstrated in support of the Zoo Keeper and against the Government.

With the election next year there is also intense debate over the electoral system. 73 of Georgia’s 150 MP’s are elected by a first past the post system, the remainder through proportional representation. This is meant to ensure that people have a representative to approach and to ensure that minorities are able to be represented.

However the proportional element is meaningless as first past the post means that the largest party is likely to have an absolute majority. In addition MP’s representing minorities are only likely to have influence if they give their support to the ruling group.

Controversially constituency sizes vary from over 150,000 voters to less than 6,000.

The UNM, who supported the system until they lost power are now keen to introduce a fairer system, while Georgian Dream want changes to the system to be delayed until after the election, although the liberal Republican Party support early change.

Georgia has not escaped the fall out of both sanctions against Russia and the Greek financial crisis – these two countries are the two largest sources of remittances from Georgians working abroad. Remittances from both countries have declined alarmingly.

Opinion polls have shown a decline in support for Georgian Dream from its peak at 60% in 2013 to less than 25%, while support for the UNM remains static at about 12%. Ambitions of joining the EU and NATO seem to be on indefinite hold, resulting in a growth in euroscepticism. Russian interests are campaigning for Georgia to join the Eurasian Union – a Russian rival to the EU – and it seems likely that pro Russian MP’s will be elected next year, with some even predicting that they could form a majority.

Georgian Instability

While violence continues in Ukraine, Georgia remains divided after similar separatist campaigns.

After violence and ethnic cleansing, South Ossetia (1991/2) and Abkhazia (1992/3) claim independence, are largely without international recognition and are effectively under Russian control. Together they make up 18% of Georgian territory.

These conflicts and a one sided war between Russia and Georgia in 2008 have left up to 10% of Georgians displaced from their homes.

Georgia has become a resolute friend of the West and aspires to join NATO and the EU.

Georgia joined the war in Afghanistan where it became the largest contingent relative to its population, and Iraq where it became the third largest contributor of personnel in absolute terms. There were no domestic protests against Georgia’s involvement in either conflict.

An oil pipeline passes through Georgia carrying oil to Europe and its strategic location in the Caucasus makes Georgia an important ally.

But unemployment is high and the economy weak. Georgians view the conflict in Ukraine with concern and hope for support from their Western allies. There are also concerns that Georgian society, though relatively stable, might be vulnerable to manipulation by outside forces, particularly Russia.

The blueprint for the setting up of ethnically based enclaves on former Soviet territory was the conflict in the Nogorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan from 1988. The Armenian majority of the region established a de-facto state with support from Russia and Iran as well as Armenia itself.

Armenia and Azerbaijan are still technically at war, and Georgia has minorities of both peoples. Not surprisingly, after the brutality of the Nogorno-Karabakh conflict, they dislike each other. About 45% of the people of the Kvemo Kartli region of Georgia are Azeris, while in the Samtskhe-Javakheti region, a majority are Armenian.

Infrastructure links through the mountains to the Samtskhe-Javakheti area have been poor and the Armenian minority have tended to identify more with Yerevan than Tbilisi. Most do not speak Georgian and rely on Russian and (pro Russian) Armenian TV and radio. Their inability to speak Georgian has also led to the Armenian community being under represented in the political system and public services.

Attempts are now being made to improve communications with the capital and to encourage Armenian farmers to trade their goods in Tbilisi rather than Yerevan, with NGO’s being particularly active. It is hoped that this will result in more Armenians learning to speak Georgian and less resentment towards Georgia.

Armenia borders Azerbaijan (with which it is officially still at war), Turkey (with whom it has no diplomatic relations, a result of the genocide against it during World War 1), Iran (with whom it has close relations) and Georgia. Georgia provides an overland route for trade with Russia, Armenia’s closest ally, meaning that Armenia has no stomach for stirring up or supporting a separatist revolt in Georgia. Russia has implemented punitive sanctions against Georgia from time to time, but there is a feeling that it has been restrained in this by not wanting to harm Armenian trade via Georgia.

This means that there is little likelihood of conflict erupting in the Samtskhe-Javakheti region in the near future, which will allow Georgia time to embrace its Armenian minority.

Although the Armenian areas do not have any special status, the Adjara area on the Black Sea coast bordering Turkey does. The population there is Georgian, speaking a local dialect of the language, their autonomy having been established in Soviet times. Almost half are Muslim.

There has been some conflict between Adjara and Tbilisi, the most recent being protests in 2004, when a more serious confrontation was avoided. In common with other divisions, the status of the area arose from Soviet administrative arrangements. Other Georgian sub groups exist, but without the same status..

Although almost 85% of the population of Georgia are Georgians, and take great pride in the history and heritage of their country, there are sub groups within the population. Georgia is a mountainous country and much of the country remote. Transportation between the regions has historically been difficult.

As in many other former communist countries, people tend to remain in the area of their birth or migrate to the capital, it being rare for people to relocate between provincial areas.

Many who live in Tbilisi maintain close links with their village of origin and will if possible maintain houses there. Holidays tend to be spent in the family village, so many Georgians have not travelled widely within their own country, despite its many tourist attractions.

This has resulted in local dialects and sub cultures remaining. In many cases the origin of Georgians can be determined by their facial features. There are many divisions that could be exploited by a powerful neighbour like Russia which feels threatened by Georgian ambitions to join NATO and the EU, especially given the weakness of the Georgian economy.

Once a powerhouse of the Soviet economy, Georgia is now in a state of financial crisis. The United National Movement, swept from power in 2010, is making a concerted bid for power in next years elections (which could be brought forward) through a strategy of protests against the ruling Georgian Dream coalition, which could have a destabilising effect.

Russia may also see an opportunity here. Already well funded groups are advocating Georgian membership of the Eurasian Union, a Russian led counter to the EU. Many Orthodox church leaders are advocating closer ties with Orthodox Russia, including some who advocate the sort of homophobic stance of Putin. There will be pro Russia candidates in the next election, and it seems certain that some will be elected.

Ironically Western measures against Russia have been a major cause of a financial crisis in Georgia.

Clearly assisting the Georgian economy offers good value to the West if the alternative could be Georgia slipping into the Russian sphere of influence. Another positive move would be the easing of visa restrictions by European countries. Currently the Schengen countries undertake to process visa applications within 10 working days. However this is triggered by an interview and the current waiting time for that is four weeks, so the agreement does little to create goodwill.  Visa free entry to the Schengen countries is under discussion.

I would expect Georgia to remain a good friend of the West. But to maintain that friendship it may need a little help from its friends.

Who are the Syrian Kurds?

by John Hiley

When the Islamic State advanced on Sinjar in northern Iraq threatening the Yazidi community with genocide, Kurdish forces from Syria entered Iraq to carry out a daring rescue. They fought off IS fighters on each side of a corridor to enable the escape of thousands of Yazidis.

The media described these forces in vague terms and neglected to report that the much praised Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga had actually retreated in disarray.

Syrian Kurdish forces in the Kobane enclave, outnumbered by IS fighters defended the city before starting to turn the tide after the USA, previously hesitant to intervene, carried out air strikes in their support.

The Kurdish areas of Syria are known to the Kurds as Rojava, and include most of the countries oil resources. They were stable from early 2011, when Kurdish forces took control meeting little resistance from the Syrian armed forces, until the attacks from IS in the summer of 2014.

There are three geographically separated Kurdish areas, all bordering Turkey, the largest being towards the far north east of Syria. Uniting these would mean occupying non Kurdish areas and possibly provoking retaliation. The current Kurdish position is of defending their territory and consolidating their gains rather than further conquest or consolodation of the Kurdish areas, which would take them into non Kurdish areas. The main conflict is with IS which dislikes the strong secularism of the Kurds as well as the more enlightened view of the role of women in politics and society.

The main Kurdish force were the Democratic Union Party (Partiya Yekîtiya Demokrat in Kurdish, they are known as the PYD). The PYD were regarded as the Syrian wing of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) which had, from the mid 80’s until 2013 waged war against the Turkish Government and which is prescribed by the EU, USA and Turkey as a terrorist organisation. Originally Marxist in ideology the PKK now describes itself as Democratic (or sometimes Libertarian) Socialist in outlook. The PYD has not been prescribed as a terrorist group.

Although the affiliation between the PYD and PKK is a fact, many Syrians have, over the years, joined the PKK in preference to the PYD and a substantial proportion of PKK fighting forces are of Syrian Kurdish origin. The PKK has moderated its stand over the years and in 2013 agreed to a ceasefire with the Turkish Government withdrawing its forces into Iraqi Kurdistan. The PKK has also dropped its call for Kurdish independence. The PYD does not call for independence from Syria, calling instead for a devolved system of Government through semi autonomous ‘Cantons’.

This followed a call by the PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned in Turkey since 1999. During this time Ocalan has read and written widely and changed his views.

In Syria the PYD now describes itself as supporting ‘pluralism and the freedom of political parties’. While Ocalan remains a revered figure, the PYD leader Saleh Muslim has emerged as an articulate and charismatic leader in his own right.

In 2011 other Syrian Kurdish groups were encouraged by Iraqi Kurdish President Massoud Barzani to unite to form the Kurdish National Council. Later that year, again under the patronage of President Barzani the PYD entered an agreement with the newly formed Council to form the Kurdish Supreme Committee. The PYD and KNC have equal representation on this body which is, officially at least, the governing body of Rojava.

The military units of the Kurdish Supreme Committee are known as the Popular Protection Units. Although predominantly Kurdish, and with women’s brigades within their ranks they also include Arab Muslims and Christians as well as Assyrian Christians and now Yazidis. Officers are elected rather than appointed. There are claims that the militias are the PYD masquerading as a broader force.

The same accusation has been made against the local committees that have been set up to administer the Kurdish areas. The PYD for their part insist that their forces and politicians are loyal to the Kurdish Supreme Committee. In practice they refer enquiries to public officials even when they might be able to act on the basis of their political remit. There is some tension between the PYD and the Iraqi Kurdish Government, which the PYD accuse of representing narrow tribal interests.

Human Rights Watch visited the north eastern Al Jazira area of Rojava, and though not totally supportive highlighted issues that are relatively mild by Syrian standards.

They described the PYD as transiting ‘from a movement … into a governing body’ a process which posed problems. They visited two prisons which they said were well run, but highlighted some violence at the point of arrest and confusion between political acts and criminality in Syria. They were also critical of a legal system which was a mixture of Syrian law and their social contract which lacks clarity. They said that that when 16 and 17 year old fighters who had been sent away from the front line returned through choice, they had not always been turned away.

HRW described the roles of women in Kurdish areas as ‘incredibly welcome and very refreshing’.

The PYD has acknowledged the criticisms and published them on its website. It seems to be trying to conduct a localised debate against a background of a country in which animosities have brought about a great deal of brutality.

Because of their association with the PKK, the Turkish Government has taken a hostile stance towards the PYD. The PYD itself, noting that the Syrian National Coalition and Syrian National Council are based in Istanbul and close to the Turkish Government, are suspicious of the recognised Syrian opposition. As a result the PYD has described itself as neutral in the conflict.

Turkey has ensured that the PYD has not been allowed to take part in the Geneva talks, with strong support in this stance from Britain. I find this unfortunate as the group seems to have a level of credibility and a grasp on reality that is unusual among the parties to the conflict, as well as being a key player among the Kurdish community which represents just under 10% of Syrians. The Kurds have a history of taking a pragmatic approach to their situation and in this the PYD are no exception.

The PYD has accused the Turkish Government of supporting IS in the past and of allowing Jihadis from Europe passage into Syria while keeping its border crossings into the Syrian Kurdish areas firmly closed.

Syrian Kurds have been treated with suspicion by the West. But pledges to protect the Yazidi community, thousands of whom are under the protection of Syrian Kurdish forces, and the successful defence of Kobane may force the West to reconsider its hostile approach towards the them.